* WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
*/
-#define RCSID "$Id: chap.c,v 1.31 2002/04/02 14:15:07 dfs Exp $"
+#define RCSID "$Id: chap.c,v 1.32 2002/05/21 17:26:49 dfs Exp $"
/*
* TODO:
BCOPY(inp, rhostname, len);
rhostname[len] = '\000';
+#ifdef CHAPMS
+ /* copy the flags into cstate for use elsewhere */
+ if (cstate->chal_type == CHAP_MICROSOFT_V2)
+ cstate->resp_flags = ((MS_Chap2Response *) remmd)->Flags[0];
+#endif /* CHAPMS */
/*
* Get secret for authenticating them with us,
* do the hash ourselves, and compare the result.
/* No M=<message>; use the error code. */
switch(error) {
case MS_CHAP_ERROR_RESTRICTED_LOGON_HOURS:
- p = "Restricted logon hours";
+ p = "E=646 Restricted logon hours";
break;
case MS_CHAP_ERROR_ACCT_DISABLED:
- p = "Account disabled";
+ p = "E=647 Account disabled";
break;
case MS_CHAP_ERROR_PASSWD_EXPIRED:
- p = "Password expired";
+ p = "E=648 Password expired";
break;
case MS_CHAP_ERROR_NO_DIALIN_PERMISSION:
- p = "No dialin permission";
+ p = "E=649 No dialin permission";
break;
case MS_CHAP_ERROR_AUTHENTICATION_FAILURE:
- p = "Authentication failure";
+ p = "E=691 Authentication failure";
break;
case MS_CHAP_ERROR_CHANGING_PASSWORD:
/* Should never see this, we don't support Change Password. */
- p = "Error changing password";
+ p = "E=709 Error changing password";
break;
default:
free(msg);
p = msg = malloc(len + 33);
if (!msg) {
- notice("Out of memory in ChapReceiveFailure");
+ novm("ChapReceiveFailure");
goto print_msg;
}
slprintf(p, len + 33, "Unknown authentication failure: %.*s",
#ifdef CHAPMS
if (cstate->chal_type == CHAP_MICROSOFT_V2) {
/*
- * Success message must be formatted as
+ * Per RFC 2759, success message must be formatted as
* "S=<auth_string> M=<message>"
* where
* <auth_string> is the Authenticator Response (mutual auth)
* <message> is a text message
+ *
+ * However, some versions of Windows (win98 tested) do not know
+ * about the M=<message> part (required per RFC 2759) and flag
+ * it as an error (reported incorrectly as an encryption error
+ * to the user). Since the RFC requires it, and it can be
+ * useful information, we supply it if the peer is a conforming
+ * system. Luckily (?), win98 sets the Flags field to 0x04
+ * (contrary to RFC requirements) so we can use that to
+ * distinguish between conforming and non-conforming systems.
+ *
+ * Special thanks to Alex Swiridov <say@real.kharkov.ua> for
+ * help debugging this.
*/
slprintf(p, q - p, "S=");
p += 2;
slprintf(p, q - p, "%s", cstate->saresponse);
p += strlen(cstate->saresponse);
+ if (cstate->resp_flags != 0)
+ goto msgdone;
slprintf(p, q - p, " M=");
p += 3;
}
*
* The M=m part is only for MS-CHAPv2, but MS-CHAP should ignore
* any extra text according to RFC 2433. So we'll go the easy
- * (read: lazy) route and include it always.
+ * (read: lazy) route and include it always. Neither win2k nor
+ * win98 (others untested) display the message to the user anyway.
+ * They also both ignore the E=e code.
+ *
+ * Note that it's safe to reuse the same challenge as we don't
+ * actually accept another response based on the error message
+ * (and no clients try to resend a response anyway).
+ *
+ * Basically, this whole bit is useless code, even the small
+ * implementation here is only because of overspecification.
*/
slprintf(p, q - p, "E=691 R=1 C=");
p += 12;
slprintf(p, q - p, "I don't like you. Go 'way.");
}
+msgdone:
msglen = strlen(msg);
outlen = CHAP_HEADERLEN + msglen;