tdb2: fix tdb_chainlock

[ccan] / ccan / tdb2 / hash.c

diff --git a/ccan/tdb2/hash.c b/ccan/tdb2/hash.c
index ae9442d934d149717cd13200bea98b8424466cfa..51874918c62ef4fb53e5581c252e8ace6301de9a 100644 (file)
--- a/ccan/tdb2/hash.c
+++ b/ccan/tdb2/hash.c
@@ -129,6 +129,13 @@ bool is_subhash(tdb_off_t val)
        return val >> (64-TDB_OFF_UPPER_STEAL) == (1<<TDB_OFF_UPPER_STEAL) - 1;
 }
 
+/* FIXME: Guess the depth, don't over-lock! */
+static tdb_off_t hlock_range(tdb_off_t group, tdb_off_t *size)
+{
+       *size = 1ULL << (64 - (TDB_TOPLEVEL_HASH_BITS - TDB_HASH_GROUP_BITS));
+       return group << (64 - (TDB_TOPLEVEL_HASH_BITS - TDB_HASH_GROUP_BITS));
+}
+
 /* This is the core routine which searches the hashtable for an entry.
  * On error, no locks are held and TDB_OFF_ERR is returned.
  * Otherwise, hinfo is filled in (and the optional tinfo).
@@ -149,11 +156,7 @@ tdb_off_t find_and_lock(struct tdb_context *tdb,
        group = use_bits(h, TDB_TOPLEVEL_HASH_BITS - TDB_HASH_GROUP_BITS);
        h->home_bucket = use_bits(h, TDB_HASH_GROUP_BITS);
 
-       /* FIXME: Guess the depth, don't over-lock! */
-       h->hlock_start = (tdb_off_t)group
-               << (64 - (TDB_TOPLEVEL_HASH_BITS - TDB_HASH_GROUP_BITS));
-       h->hlock_range = 1ULL << (64 - (TDB_TOPLEVEL_HASH_BITS
-                                       - TDB_HASH_GROUP_BITS));
+       h->hlock_start = hlock_range(group, &h->hlock_range);
        if (tdb_lock_hashes(tdb, h->hlock_start, h->hlock_range, ltype,
                            TDB_LOCK_WAIT))
                return TDB_OFF_ERR;
@@ -537,7 +540,7 @@ again:
 /* Return 1 if we find something, 0 if not, -1 on error. */
 int next_in_hash(struct tdb_context *tdb, int ltype,
                 struct traverse_info *tinfo,
-                TDB_DATA *kbuf, unsigned int *dlen)
+                TDB_DATA *kbuf, size_t *dlen)
 {
        const unsigned group_bits = TDB_TOPLEVEL_HASH_BITS-TDB_HASH_GROUP_BITS;
        tdb_off_t hlock_start, hlock_range, off;
@@ -560,6 +563,14 @@ int next_in_hash(struct tdb_context *tdb, int ltype,
                                                  ltype);
                                return -1;
                        }
+                       if (rec_magic(&rec) != TDB_MAGIC) {
+                               tdb->log(tdb, TDB_DEBUG_FATAL, tdb->log_priv,
+                                        "next_in_hash:"
+                                        " corrupt record at %llu\n",
+                                        (long long)off);
+                               return -1;
+                       }
+
                        kbuf->dsize = rec_key_length(&rec);
 
                        /* They want data as well? */
@@ -591,7 +602,7 @@ int next_in_hash(struct tdb_context *tdb, int ltype,
 /* Return 1 if we find something, 0 if not, -1 on error. */
 int first_in_hash(struct tdb_context *tdb, int ltype,
                  struct traverse_info *tinfo,
-                 TDB_DATA *kbuf, unsigned int *dlen)
+                 TDB_DATA *kbuf, size_t *dlen)
 {
        tinfo->prev = 0;
        tinfo->toplevel_group = 0;
@@ -602,3 +613,46 @@ int first_in_hash(struct tdb_context *tdb, int ltype,
 
        return next_in_hash(tdb, ltype, tinfo, kbuf, dlen);
 }
+
+/* Even if the entry isn't in this hash bucket, you'd have to lock this
+ * bucket to find it. */
+static int chainlock(struct tdb_context *tdb, const TDB_DATA *key,
+                    int ltype, enum tdb_lock_flags waitflag,
+                    const char *func)
+{
+       int ret;
+       uint64_t h = tdb_hash(tdb, key->dptr, key->dsize);
+       tdb_off_t lockstart, locksize;
+       unsigned int group, gbits;
+
+       gbits = TDB_TOPLEVEL_HASH_BITS - TDB_HASH_GROUP_BITS;
+       group = bits(h, 64 - gbits, gbits);
+
+       lockstart = hlock_range(group, &locksize);
+
+       ret = tdb_lock_hashes(tdb, lockstart, locksize, ltype, waitflag);
+       tdb_trace_1rec(tdb, func, *key);
+       return ret;
+}
+
+/* lock/unlock one hash chain. This is meant to be used to reduce
+   contention - it cannot guarantee how many records will be locked */
+int tdb_chainlock(struct tdb_context *tdb, TDB_DATA key)
+{
+       return chainlock(tdb, &key, F_WRLCK, TDB_LOCK_WAIT, "tdb_chainlock");
+}
+
+int tdb_chainunlock(struct tdb_context *tdb, TDB_DATA key)
+{
+       uint64_t h = tdb_hash(tdb, key.dptr, key.dsize);
+       tdb_off_t lockstart, locksize;
+       unsigned int group, gbits;
+
+       gbits = TDB_TOPLEVEL_HASH_BITS - TDB_HASH_GROUP_BITS;
+       group = bits(h, 64 - gbits, gbits);
+
+       lockstart = hlock_range(group, &locksize);
+
+       tdb_trace_1rec(tdb, "tdb_chainunlock", key);
+       return tdb_unlock_hashes(tdb, lockstart, locksize, F_WRLCK);
+}