Fix bit-0-is-lsb ordering
authorJeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:31:36 +0000 (17:31 +1100)
committerJeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:58:49 +0000 (10:58 +1100)
Turns out we weren't handling the lsb-first bit numbering very well,
especially for multiple-bit fields.

Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>

No differences found