+ /* Try locking first half, then second. */
+ ret = tdb_chainlock_gradual(tdb, ltype, flags, off, len / 2);
+ if (ret == -1)
+ return -1;
+
+ ret = tdb_chainlock_gradual(tdb, ltype, flags,
+ off + len / 2, len - len / 2);
+ if (ret == -1) {
+ tdb_brunlock(tdb, ltype, off, len / 2);
+ return -1;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* lock/unlock entire database. It can only be upgradable if you have some
+ * other way of guaranteeing exclusivity (ie. transaction write lock).
+ * We do the locking gradually to avoid being starved by smaller locks. */
+int tdb_allrecord_lock(struct tdb_context *tdb, int ltype,
+ enum tdb_lock_flags flags, bool upgradable)
+{
+ switch (tdb_allrecord_check(tdb, ltype, flags, upgradable)) {
+ case -1:
+ return -1;
+ case 0:
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ /* We cover two kinds of locks:
+ * 1) Normal chain locks. Taken for almost all operations.
+ * 3) Individual records locks. Taken after normal or free
+ * chain locks.
+ *
+ * It is (1) which cause the starvation problem, so we're only
+ * gradual for that. */
+ if (tdb_chainlock_gradual(tdb, ltype, flags, FREELIST_TOP,
+ tdb->header.hash_size * 4) == -1) {
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ /* Grab individual record locks. */
+ if (tdb_brlock(tdb, ltype, lock_offset(tdb->header.hash_size), 0,
+ flags) == -1) {
+ tdb_brunlock(tdb, ltype, FREELIST_TOP,
+ tdb->header.hash_size * 4);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ tdb->allrecord_lock.count = 1;
+ /* If it's upgradable, it's actually exclusive so we can treat
+ * it as a write lock. */
+ tdb->allrecord_lock.ltype = upgradable ? F_WRLCK : ltype;
+ tdb->allrecord_lock.off = upgradable;
+
+ if (tdb_needs_recovery(tdb)) {
+ bool mark = flags & TDB_LOCK_MARK_ONLY;
+ tdb_allrecord_unlock(tdb, ltype, mark);
+ if (mark) {
+ tdb->ecode = TDB_ERR_LOCK;
+ TDB_LOG((tdb, TDB_DEBUG_ERROR,
+ "tdb_lockall_mark cannot do recovery\n"));
+ return -1;
+ }
+ if (tdb_lock_and_recover(tdb) == -1) {
+ return -1;
+ }
+ return tdb_allrecord_lock(tdb, ltype, flags, upgradable);
+ }