From 2c56e4d9ec516aceb9c5b26ceebd6d99361855c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:21:23 +0930
Subject: [PATCH] tdb2: fix argument order for tdb_gradual_lock. This explains
 why most of tdb_gradual_lock was not tested: thanks gcov!

---
 ccan/tdb2/lock.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ccan/tdb2/lock.c b/ccan/tdb2/lock.c
index c8dbf826..2b005845 100644
--- a/ccan/tdb2/lock.c
+++ b/ccan/tdb2/lock.c
@@ -485,8 +485,8 @@ int tdb_allrecord_lock(struct tdb_context *tdb, int ltype,
 	/* Lock all the hash buckets. */
 again:
 	hash_size = (1ULL << tdb->header.v.hash_bits);
-	if (tdb_lock_gradual(tdb, ltype, TDB_HASH_LOCK_START,
-			     1ULL << tdb->header.v.hash_bits, flags)) {
+	if (tdb_lock_gradual(tdb, ltype, flags, TDB_HASH_LOCK_START,
+			     hash_size)) {
 		if (!(flags & TDB_LOCK_PROBE)) {
 			tdb->log(tdb, TDB_DEBUG_ERROR, tdb->log_priv,
 				 "tdb_lockall hashes failed (%s)\n",
-- 
2.39.2