From: Rusty Russell Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 07:36:30 +0000 (+0930) Subject: Fix traverse nesting unlock bug. X-Git-Url: http://git.ozlabs.org/?p=ccan;a=commitdiff_plain;h=2cad878947b3abd9d30841d6b80a5146479ac709 Fix traverse nesting unlock bug. --- diff --git a/ccan/tdb/test/run-nested-traverse.c b/ccan/tdb/test/run-nested-traverse.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000..f4a36b62 --- /dev/null +++ b/ccan/tdb/test/run-nested-traverse.c @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ +#define _XOPEN_SOURCE 500 +#include "tdb/tdb.h" +#include "tdb/io.c" +#include "tdb/tdb.c" +#include "tdb/lock.c" +#include "tdb/freelist.c" +#include "tdb/traverse.c" +#include "tdb/transaction.c" +#include "tdb/error.c" +#include "tdb/open.c" +#include "tap/tap.h" +#include +#include +#include + +static bool correct_key(TDB_DATA key) +{ + return key.dsize == strlen("hi") + && memcmp(key.dptr, "hi", key.dsize) == 0; +} + +static bool correct_data(TDB_DATA data) +{ + return data.dsize == strlen("world") + && memcmp(data.dptr, "world", data.dsize) == 0; +} + +static int traverse2(struct tdb_context *tdb, TDB_DATA key, TDB_DATA data, + void *p) +{ + ok1(correct_key(key)); + ok1(correct_data(data)); + return 0; +} + +static int traverse1(struct tdb_context *tdb, TDB_DATA key, TDB_DATA data, + void *p) +{ + ok1(correct_key(key)); + ok1(correct_data(data)); + ok1(tdb->have_transaction_lock); + tdb_traverse(tdb, traverse2, NULL); + + /* That should *not* release the transaction lock! */ + ok1(tdb->have_transaction_lock); + return 0; +} + +int main(int argc, char *argv[]) +{ + struct tdb_context *tdb; + TDB_DATA key, data; + + plan_tests(14); + tdb = tdb_open("/tmp/test.tdb", 1024, TDB_CLEAR_IF_FIRST, + O_CREAT|O_TRUNC|O_RDWR, 0600); + ok1(tdb); + + /* Tickle bug on appending zero length buffer to zero length buffer. */ + key.dsize = strlen("hi"); + key.dptr = (void *)"hi"; + data.dptr = (void *)"world"; + data.dsize = strlen("world"); + + ok1(tdb_store(tdb, key, data, TDB_INSERT) == 0); + tdb_traverse(tdb, traverse1, NULL); + tdb_traverse_read(tdb, traverse1, NULL); + tdb_close(tdb); + + return exit_status(); +} diff --git a/ccan/tdb/traverse.c b/ccan/tdb/traverse.c index 6bbaac8d..6397930b 100644 --- a/ccan/tdb/traverse.c +++ b/ccan/tdb/traverse.c @@ -182,6 +182,7 @@ static int tdb_traverse_internal(struct tdb_context *tdb, } if (fn && fn(tdb, key, dbuf, private_data)) { /* They want us to terminate traversal */ + tdb_trace(tdb, "tdb_traverse_end = %i\n", count); ret = count; if (tdb_unlock_record(tdb, tl->off) != 0) { TDB_LOG((tdb, TDB_DEBUG_FATAL, "tdb_traverse: unlock_record failed!\n"));; @@ -192,6 +193,7 @@ static int tdb_traverse_internal(struct tdb_context *tdb, } SAFE_FREE(key.dptr); } + tdb_trace(tdb, "tdb_traverse_end\n"); out: tdb->travlocks.next = tl->next; if (ret < 0) @@ -212,17 +214,18 @@ int tdb_traverse_read(struct tdb_context *tdb, /* we need to get a read lock on the transaction lock here to cope with the lock ordering semantics of solaris10 */ - if (tdb_transaction_lock(tdb, F_RDLCK)) { + if (tdb->traverse_read == 0 && tdb_transaction_lock(tdb, F_RDLCK)) { return -1; } tdb->traverse_read++; tdb_trace(tdb, "tdb_traverse_read_start\n"); ret = tdb_traverse_internal(tdb, fn, private_data, &tl); - tdb_trace(tdb, "tdb_traverse_end = %i\n", ret); tdb->traverse_read--; - tdb_transaction_unlock(tdb); + if (tdb->traverse_read == 0) { + tdb_transaction_unlock(tdb); + } return ret; } @@ -243,18 +246,20 @@ int tdb_traverse(struct tdb_context *tdb, if (tdb->read_only || tdb->traverse_read) { return tdb_traverse_read(tdb, fn, private_data); } - - if (tdb_transaction_lock(tdb, F_WRLCK)) { + + /* Nested traversals: transaction lock doesn't nest. */ + if (tdb->traverse_write == 0 && tdb_transaction_lock(tdb, F_WRLCK)) { return -1; } tdb->traverse_write++; tdb_trace(tdb, "tdb_traverse_start\n"); ret = tdb_traverse_internal(tdb, fn, private_data, &tl); - tdb_trace(tdb, "tdb_traverse_end = %i\n", ret); tdb->traverse_write--; - tdb_transaction_unlock(tdb); + if (tdb->traverse_write == 0) { + tdb_transaction_unlock(tdb); + } return ret; }