tdb: spelling fixes

[ccan] / ccan / tdb / traverse.c

diff --git a/ccan/tdb/traverse.c b/ccan/tdb/traverse.c
index d329ef4da4030c095e530b0d7b05b344c2256305..c605c8e6a3b5b02344a662d492ad31f3497043cf 100644 (file)
--- a/ccan/tdb/traverse.c
+++ b/ccan/tdb/traverse.c
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ static tdb_off_t tdb_next_lock(struct tdb_context *tdb, struct tdb_traverse_lock
        /* Lock each chain from the start one. */
        for (; tlock->hash < tdb->header.hash_size; tlock->hash++) {
                if (!tlock->off && tlock->hash != 0) {
-                       /* this is an optimisation for the common case where
+                       /* this is an optimization for the common case where
                           the hash chain is empty, which is particularly
                           common for the use of tdb with ldb, where large
                           hashes are used. In that case we spend most of our
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ static tdb_off_t tdb_next_lock(struct tdb_context *tdb, struct tdb_traverse_lock
                           lock, so instead we get the lock and re-fetch the
                           value below.
                           
-                          Notice that not doing this optimisation on the
+                          Notice that not doing this optimization on the
                           first hash chain is critical. We must guarantee
                           that we have done at least one fcntl lock at the
                           start of a search to guarantee that memory is