Efficient Chains Of Unpredictable Numbers
=========================================
The Problem
-----------
The Lightning Network wants a chain of (say 1 million) unguessable 256
bit values; we generate them and send them one at a time to a remote
node. We don't want the remote node to have to store all the values,
so it's better if they can derive them once they see them.
A Simple Solution
-----------------
A simple system is a hash chain: we select a random seed value, the
hash it 1,000,000 times. This gives the first "random" number.
Hashed 999,999 times gives the second number, etc. ie:
R(0) = seed
R(N+1) = SHA256(R(N))
This way the remote node needs only to remember the last R(N) it was
given, and it can calculate any R for N+1 or above.
However, this means we need to generate 1 million hashes up front, and
then do almost as many hashes to derive the next number. That's slow.
A Tree Solution
---------------
A better solution is to use a binary tree, with the seed at the root.
The left child is the same as the parent, the right child is the
SHA256() of the parent with one bit flipped (corresponding to the
height).
This gives a tree like so:
seed
/ \
/ \
/ \
/ \
seed SHA256(seed^1)
/ \ / \
seed SHA256(seed^2) SHA256(seed^1) SHA256(SHA256(seed^1)^2)
Index: 0 1 2 3
Clearly, giving R(2) allows you to derive R(3), giving R(1) allows you
to derive nothing new (you still have to remember R(2)), and giving
R(0) allows you to derive everything.
In pseudocode, this looks like the following for a 64 bit tree:
generate_from_seed(index):
value = seed
for bit in 0 to 63:
if bit set in index:
flip(bit) in value
value = SHA256(value)
return value
The Receiver's Tree
-------------------
To derive the value for a index N, you need to have the root of a tree
which contains it. That is the same as needing an index I which is N
rounded down in binary: eg. if N is 0b001100001, you need 0b001100000,
0b001000000 or 0b000000000.
Pseudocode:
# Can we derive the value for to_index from from_index?
can_derive(from_index, to_index):
# to_index must be a subtree under from_index; this is the same as
# saying that to_index must be the same as from_index up to the
# trailing zeros in from_index.
for bit in count_trailing_zeroes(from_index)..63:
if bit set in from_index != bit set in to_index:
return false
return true
# Derive a value from a lesser index: generalization of generate_from_seed()
derive(from_index, to_index, from_value):
assert(can_derive(from_index, to_index))
value = from_value
for bit in 0..63:
if bit set in to_index and not bit set in from_index:
flip bit in value
value = SHA256(value)
return value
If you are receiving values (in reverse order), you need to remember
up to 64 of them to derive all previous values. The simplest method
is to keep an array, indexed by the number of trailing zeroes in the
received index:
# Receive a new value (assumes we receive them in order)
receive_value(index, value):
pos = count_trailing_zeroes(index)
# We should be able to generate every lesser value, otherwise invalid
for i in 0..pos-1:
if derive(index, value, known[i].index) != known[i].value:
return false
known[pos].index = index
known[pos].value = value
return true
To derive a previous value, find an element in that array from which
you can derive the value you want, eg:
# Find an old value
regenerate_value(index):
for i in known:
if can_derive(i.index, index):
return derive(i.index, i.value, index)
fail
You can see the implementation for more optimized variants of the
above code.
Rusty Russell